Література

Література

1 Смирнов И. В., Шелманов А. О. Семантико-синтаксический анализ естественных языков. Часть I. Обзор методов синтаксического и семантического анализа текстов // Искусственный интеллект и принятие решений. — 2013. — № 1. — С. 41–54. 2 Relational–situational method for intelligent search and analysis of scientific publications / Gennady Osipov, Ivan Smirnov, Ilya Tikhomirov, Artem Shelmanov // Proceedings of the Workshop on Integrating IR technologies for Professional Search, in conjunction with the 35th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR’13). — Vol. 968. — CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2013. 3 Семантико-синтаксический анализ естественных языков Часть II. Метод семантико-синтаксического анализа текстов / И. В. Смирнов, А. О. Шелманов, Е. С. Кузнецова, И. В. Храмоин // Искусственный интеллект и принятие решений. — № 1. — С. 11–24. 4 Shelmanov A. O., Smirnov I. V. Methods for semantic role labeling of Russian texts // Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Papers from the Annual International Conference "Dialogue" (2014). — No. 13. — 2014. — P. 607– 620. 5 Осипов Г. С., Шелманов А. О. Метод повышения качества синтаксического анализа на основе взаимодействия синтаксических и семантических правил // Труды шестой международной конференции "Системный анализ и информационные технологии" (САИТ). — Т. 1. — 2015. — С. 229–240. 6 Шелманов А. О. Метод автоматического выделения многословных терминов из текстов научных публикаций // Труды тринадцатой национальной конференции по искусственному интеллекту с международным участием КИИ-2012. — Т. 1. — Белгород, 2012. — С. 268–274. 7 Шелманов А. О., Смирнов И. В. «Программа лингвистического анализа неструктурированной текстовой информации на русском и английском языках» // Свидетельство о государственной регистрации программ для ЭВМ. № 2013613430. — 2013. 8 ETAP parser: state of the art / L. Iomdin, V. Petrochenkov, V. Sizov, L. Tsinman // Papers from the Annual International Conference "Dialogue" (2012). — 2012. — P. 830–853. 9 Syntactic and semantic parser based on ABBYY Compreno linguistic technologies / K. V. Anisimovich, K. Ju. Druzhkin, F. R. Minlos et al. // Papers from the Annual International Conference "Dialogue" (2012). — Vol. 2. — 2012. — P. 91–103. 10 Chomsky N. Three models for the description of language // IRE Transactions on Information Theory. — 1956. — Vol. 2, no. 3. — P. 113–124. 11 Tesnière L. Elements de syntaxe structurale. — Editions Klincksieck, 1959. 12 Mel’cuk I. A. Dependency syntax: theory and practice. — ŠUNY Press, 1988. — P. 428. 13 Chomsky N. Syntactic structures. — The Hague : Mouton, 1957. — P. 117. 14 Partee B., Ter Meulen A., Wall R. Mathematical methods in linguistics. — Springer, 1990. — Vol. 30 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. 15 Huybregts R. The weak inadequacy of context-free phrase structure grammars // Van Periferie naar Kern. — 1984. — P. 81–99. 16 Shieber S. M. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language // The Formal Complexity of Natural Language. — 1987. — Vol. 33. — P. 320–334. 17 Hudson R. Word grammar. — Blackwell Oxford, 1984. 18 Karlsson F. Constraint grammar as a framework for parsing running text // Proceedings of the 13th conference on Computational linguistics. — Vol. 3. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 1990. — P. 168–173. 19 Universal dependency annotation for multilingual parsing / Ryan Mcdonald, Joakim Nivre, Yvonne Quirmbach-brundage et al. // Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. — Vol. 2. — 2013. — P. 92–97. 20 Nivre J. Dependency grammar and dependency parsing // MSI report. — 2005. — Vol. 5133, no. 1959. — P. 1–32. 21 Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms / Ryan McDonald, Fernando Pereira, Kiril Ribarov, Jan Hajic // Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. — P. 523–530. 22 Тестелец Я. Г. Введение в общий синтаксис. — М.: Издательство РГГУ, 2001. 23 Jurafsky D., Martin J. H. Speech & language processing. — Pearson Education, 2000. 24 Сулейманова Е. А. О комплексном подходе к разрешению реляционноаппозитивных неоднозначностей // Программные системы: теория и приложения. — 2014. — Т. 5, № 4. — С. 41–66. 25 Kasami T. An efficient recognition and syntax analysis algorithm for context-free languages. — 1965. — Technical report. 26 Younger D. H. Recognition and parsing of context-free languages in time n^3 // Information and control. — 1967. — Vol. 10, no. 2. — P. 189–208. 27 Earley J. An efficient context-free parsing algorithm // Communications of the ACM. — 1970. — Vol. 13, no. 2. — P. 94–102. 28 Kay M. Algorithm schemata and data structures in syntactic processing // Technical Report CSL80-12. — 1980. 29 Tomita M. LR parsers for natural languages // Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Computational linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 1984. — P. 354–357. 30 Collins M. Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing // Computational linguistics. — 2003. — Vol. 29, no. 4. — P. 589–637. 31 Marcus M. P., Marcinkiewicz M. A., Santorini B. Building a large annotated corpus of English the Penn treebank // Computational Linguistics. — 1993. — Vol. 19, no. 2. — P. 313–330. 32 Collins M. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing // Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 1997. — P. 16–23. 33 Hays D. G. Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations // Language. — 1964. — Vol. 40. — P. 511–525. 34 Gaifman H. Dependency systems and phrase-structure systems // Information and control. — 1965. — Vol. 8, no. 3. — P. 304–337. 35 Holan T., Kubon V., Plátek M. A prototype of a grammar checker for Czech // Proceedings of the fifth conference on Applied natural language processing. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 1997. — P. 147–154. 36 Lombardo V., Lesmo L. An Earley-type recognizer for dependency grammar // Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 1996. — P. 723–728. 37 Maruyama H. Structural disambiguation with constraint propagation // Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 1990. — P. 31–38. 38 Covington M. A. A fundamental algorithm for dependency parsing // Proceedings of the 39th annual ACM Southeast Conference. — 2001. — P. 95–102. 39 Eisner J. M. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration // Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics. — Vol. 1. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 1996. — P. 340–345. 40 McDonald R., Crammer K., Pereira F. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers // Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. — P. 91–98. 41 Chu Y.-J., Liu T.-H. On shortest arborescence of a directed graph // Scientia Sinica. — 1965. — Vol. 14, no. 10. — P. 1396. 42 Edmonds J. Optimum branchings // Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section B: Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. — 1967. — Vol. 71B, no. 4. — P. 233–240. 43 Mcdonald R., Pereira F. Online learning of approximate dependency parsing algorithms // Proceedings of European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006. 44 Nakagawa T. Multilingual dependency parsing using global features // Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task Session of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. — P. 952–956. 45 Carreras X. Experiments with a higher-order projective dependency parser // Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task Session of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. — P. 957–961. 46 Zhang H., McDonald R. Generalized higher-order dependency parsing with cube pruning // Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012. — P. 320–331. 47 McDonald R., Satta G. On the complexity of non-projective data-driven dependency parsing // Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Parsing Technologies. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. — P. 121–132. 48 Kudo T., Matsumoto Y. Japanese dependency structure analysis based on support vector machines // Proceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing and very large corpora: held in conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. — Vol. 13. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2000. — P. 18–25. 49 Yamada H., Matsumoto Y. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines // Proceedings of 8th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies. — 2003. — P. 195–206. 50 Nivre J., Hall J., Nilsson J. Memory-based dependency parsing // Proceedings of CoNLL. — 2004. — P. 49–56. 51 Nivre J. Inductive Dependency Parsing of Natural Language Text : Ph.D. thesis / Joakim Nivre ; School of Mathematics and Systems Engineering, Växjö University. — 2005. 52 Nivre J., Nilsson J. Pseudo-projective dependency parsing // Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. — P. 99–106. 53 MaltParser: A language-independent system for data-driven dependency parsing / Joakim Nivre, Johan Hall, Jens Nilsson et al. // Natural Language Engineering. — 2007. — Vol. 13, no. 2. — P. 95–135. 54 Nivre J., Hall J., Nilsson J. MaltParser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing // Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). — Vol. 6. — 2006. — P. 2216–2219. 55 Nivre J., Boguslavsky I. M., Iomdin L. L. Parsing the SynTagRus treebank of Russian // Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008). — Manchester, UK, 2008. — August. — P. 641–648. 56 Sharoff S., Nivre J. The proper place of men and machines in language technology: Processing Russian without any linguistic knowledge // Papers from the Annual International Conference "Dialogue" (2011). — No. 10. — 2011. — P. 17. 57 Апресян Ю. Д. Лингвистическое обеспечение системы ЭТАП-2. — Наука, 1989. 58 Казенников А. О. Сравнительный анализ статистических алгоритмов синтаксического анализа на основе деревьев зависимостей // Труды международной конференции "Диалог 2010". — 2010. 59 Белоногов Г. Г., Калинин Ю. П., Хорошилов А. А. Компьютерная лингвистика и перспективные информационные технологии. — М: Русский мир, 2004. 60 Белоногов Г. Г. Теоретические проблемы информатики, том 2. семантические проблемы информатики // М.: РЭА им. Г.В. Плеханова. — 2008. 61 Белоногов Г. Г., Гиляровский Р. С., др. Проблемы автоматической смысловой обработки текстовой информации // Научно-техническая информация. Сер. 2. Информационные процессы и системы. — 2012. — № 11. — С. 24–28. 62 Ножов И. М. Морфологическая и синтаксическая обработка текста (модели и программы) : Дисс кандидата наук / И. М. Ножов. — 2003. 63 Автоматизация отладки алгоритмов поверхностно-синтаксического анализа / А. М. Баталина, Г. Ю. Айриян, М. Е. Епифанов и др. // Труды международной конференции "Диалог 2005". — 2005. — С. 45–50. 64 Кобзарева Т. Ю., Епифанов М. Е., Лахути Д. Г. Восстановление грамматических эллипсисов при синтаксическом анализе // Труды международной конференции КИИ-2014. — 2014. 65 Каневский Е. А., Боярский К. К. Семантико-синтаксический анализатор SemSin // Труды международной конференции "Диалог 2012". — 2012. 66 Antonova A. A., Misyurev A. V. Russian dependency parser SyntAutom at the DIALOGUE-2012 parser evaluation task // Papers from the Annual International Conference "Dialogue" (2012). — 2012. 67 Синтаксически и семантически аннотированный корпус русского языка: современное состояние и перспективы / Ю. Д. Апресян, И. М. Богуславский, Б. Л. Иомдин и др. // Национальный корпус русского языка: 2003–2005. — 2005. — С. 193–214. 68 Поспелов Д. А. Десять горячих точек в исследованиях по искусственному интеллекту // Интеллектуальные системы (МГУ). — 1996. — Т. 1, № 1-4. — С. 47–56. 69 Jurafsky D., Martin J. Speech And Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence. — Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009. 70 Montague R. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English // Approaches to Natural Language / Ed. by K. J. J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsic, P. Suppes. — Springer, 1973. — P. 221–242. 71 Bach E. An extension of classical transformational grammar // Problems of Linguistic Metatheory (Proceedings of the 1976 Conference). — 1976. 72 Nishida T.-a., Doshita S. An English-Japanese machine translation system based on formal semantics of natural language // Proceedings of the 9th conference on Computational linguistics. — Vol. 1. — 1982. — P. 277–282. 73 Fillmore C. J. The case for case // Universals in Linguistic Theory / Ed. by Emmon Bach, Robert T. Harms. — New York, 1968. — P. 1–88. 74 Осипов Г. С. Методы искусственного интеллекта. — ФИЗМАТЛИТ, 2011. 75 Jackendoff R. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. — MIT press Cambridge, MA, 1972. 76 Богданов В. В. Семантико-синтаксическая организация предложения. — Издво Ленинградского университета, 1977. 77 Кибрик А. Е. Очерки по общим и прикладным вопросам языкознания: (универсальное, типовое и специфическое в языке). — М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1992. 78 Кашкин Е. В., Ляшевская О. Н. Семантические роли и сеть конструкций в системе FrameBank // Труды международной конференции "Диалог 2013". — 2013. — С. 325–343. 79 Плунгян В. А. Введение в грамматическую семантику: грамматические значения и грамматические системы языков мира: учебное пособие. — М.: Издательство РГГУ, 2011. 80 Dowty D. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection // Language. — 1991. — P. 547–619. 81 Palmer M., Gildea D., Kingsbury P. The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles // Computational linguistics. — 2005. — Vol. 31, no. 1. — P. 71– 106. 82 Fillmore C. J., Johnson C. R., Petruck M. R. Background to FrameNet // International journal of lexicography. — 2003. — Vol. 16, no. 3. — P. 235–250. 83 The NomBank project: An interim report / A. Meyers, R. Reeves, C. Macleod et al. // HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: Frontiers in Corpus Annotation. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004. — P. 24–31. 84 Xue N., Palmer M. Adding semantic roles to the Chinese treebank // Natural Language Engineering. — 2009. — Vol. 15, no. 1. — P. 143–172. 85 The revised Arabic PropBank / Wajdi Zaghouani, Mona Diab, Aous Mansouri et al. // Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010. — P. 222–226. 86 Using FrameNet for the semantic analysis of German: Annotation, representation, and automation / Aljoscha Burchardt, Katrin Erk, Anette Frank et al. // Multilingual FrameNets in Computational Lexicography / Ed. by Hans C. Boas. — Mouton, 2009. — P. 209–244. 87 Subirats C. Spanish FrameNet: A frame-semantic analysis of the Spanish lexicon // Multilingual FrameNets in Computational Lexicography: Methods and Applications / Ed. by Hans Boas. — Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. — P. 135–162. 88 Gildea D., Jurafsky D. Automatic labeling of semantic roles // Computational Linguistics. — 2002. — Vol. 28, no. 3. — P. 245–288. 89 Carreras X., Marquez L. Introduction to the CoNLL-2004 shared task: Semantic role labeling // Proceedings of CoNLL’2004 Shared Task. — 2004. 90 Carreras X., Màrquez L. Introduction to the CoNLL-2005 shared task: Semantic role labeling // Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005). — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. — P. 152–164. 91 The CoNLL-2008 shared task on joint parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies / Mihai Surdeanu, Richard Johansson, Adam Meyers et al. // Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. — P. 159–177. 92 The CoNLL-2009 shared task: Syntactic and semantic dependencies in multiple languages / Jan Hajic, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Richard Johansson et al. // Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. — P. 1–18. 93 Shen D., Lapata M. Using semantic roles to improve question answering // Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLPCoNLL). — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. — P. 12–21. 94 Using predicate-argument structures for information extraction / Mihai Surdeanu, Sanda Harabagiu, John Williams, Paul Aarseth // Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003. — P. 8–15. 95 Khan A., Salim N., Kumar Y. J. A framework for multi-document abstractive summarization based on semantic role labelling // Applied Soft Computing. — 2015. — Vol. 30. — P. 737–747. 96 Description of SQUASH, the SFU question answering summary handler for the DUC-2005 summarization task / G. Melli, Y. Wang, Y. Liu et al. — 2005. 97 Wu D., Fung P. Semantic roles for SMT: a hybrid two-pass model // Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume: Short Papers. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. — P. 13–16. 98 Liu D., Gildea D. Semantic role features for machine translation // Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010. — P. 716–724. 99 Osipov G. Methods for extracting semantic types of natural language statements from texts // 10th IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control. — Monterey, California, USA, 1995. 100 Золотова Г. А., Онипенко Н. К., Сидорова М. Ю. Коммуникативная грамматика русского языка // Институт русского языка РАН им. В. В. Виноградова. — 2004. 101 Осипов Г. С., Смирнов И. В., Тихомиров И. А. Реляционно-ситуационный метод поиска и анализа текстов и его приложения // Искусственный интеллект и принятие решений. — 2008. — № 2. — С. 3–10. 102 Osipov G., Smirnov I., Tikhomirov I. Relational-situational method for text search and analysis and its applications // Scientific and Technical Information Processing. — 2010. — Vol. 37, no. 6. — P. 432–437. 103 Application of linguistic knowledge to search precision improvement / Gennady Osipov, Ivan Smirnov, Ilya Tikhomirov, Olga Zavjalova // Intelligent Systems, 2008. IS’08. 4th International IEEE Conference. — Vol. 2. — 2008. — P. 17–2–17–5. 104 Shallow semantic parsing using support vector machines / Sameer S Pradhan, Wayne H Ward, Kadri Hacioglu et al. // HLT-NAACL 2004: Main Proceedings. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004. — P. 233–240. 105 Semantic role labeling using maximum entropy model / Joon-Ho Lim, YoungSook Hwang, So-Young Park, Hae-Chang Rim // Proceedings of CoNLL. — 2004. — P. 122–125. 106 Xue N., Palmer M. Calibrating features for semantic role labeling // Proceedings of EMNLP 2004. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004. — P. 88–94. 107 Toutanova K., Haghighi A., Manning C. D. Joint learning improves semantic role labeling // Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. — P. 589–596. 108 Choi J. D., Palmer M. Transition-based semantic role labeling using predicate argument clustering // Proceedings of the ACL 2011 Workshop on Relational Models of Semantics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011. — P. 37–45. 109 Johansson R., Nugues P. Dependency-based syntactic-semantic analysis with PropBank and NomBank // Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. — P. 183–187. 110 A high-performance syntactic and semantic dependency parser / Anders Björkelund, Bernd Bohnet, Love Hafdell, Pierre Nugues // Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010. — P. 33–36. 111 Miller G. A. WordNet: A lexical database for English // Communications of the ACM. — 1995. — Vol. 38, no. 1. — P. 39–41. 112 Support vector learning for semantic argument classification / Sameer Pradhan, Kadri Hacioglu, Valerie Krugler et al. // Machine Learning. — 2005. — Vol. 60, no. 1-3. — P. 11–39. 113 Semantic role labeling: an introduction to the special issue / Lluis Marquez, Xavier Carreras, Kenneth Litkowski, Suzanne Stevenson // Computational linguistics. — 2008. — Vol. 34, no. 2. — P. 145–159. 114 Punyakanok V., Roth D., Yih W.-t. The importance of syntactic parsing and inference in semantic role labeling // Computational Linguistics. — 2008. — Vol. 34, no. 2. — P. 257–287. 115 Toutanova K., Haghighi A., Manning C. D. A global joint model for semantic role labeling // Computational Linguistics. — 2008. — Vol. 34, no. 2. — P. 161–191. 116 Thompson C. A., Levy R., Manning C. D. A generative model for semantic role labeling // Machine Learning: ECML 2003. — Springer, 2003. — P. 397–408. 117 Cohn T., Blunsom P. Semantic role labelling with tree conditional random fields // Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. — P. 169–172. 118 Meza-Ruiz I., Riedel S. Jointly identifying predicates, arguments and senses using Markov logic // Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. — P. 155–163. 119 Combination strategies for semantic role labeling / Mihai Surdeanu, Lluís Màrquez, Xavier Carreras, Pere R Comas // Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. — 2007. — P. 105–151. 120 Semantic role chunking combining complementary syntactic views / Sameer Pradhan, Kadri Hacioglu, Wayne Ward et al. // Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. — P. 217–220. 121 Semantic role labeling as sequential tagging / Llus Màrquez, Pere Comas, Jesús Giménez, Neus Catala // Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. — P. 193–196. 122 Lyashevskaya O. N., Kashkin E. V. Evaluation of frame-semantic role labeling in a case-marking language // Papers from the Annual International Conference "Dialogue" (2014). — 2014. — P. 350–365. 123 Ермаков А. Е., Плешко В. В. Семантическая интерпретация в системах компьютерного анализа текста // Информационные технологии. — 2009. — Т. 6. — С. 2–7. 124 Сокирко А. В. Семантические словари в автоматической обработке текста (по материалам системы ДИАЛИНГ) : Дисс кандидата наук / А. В. Сокирко. — 2001. 125 Смирнов И. В. Метод автоматического установления значений минимальных синтаксических единиц текста // Информационные технологии и вычислительные системы. — 2008. — № 3. — С. 30–45. 126 Padó S., Lapata M. Cross-lingual annotation projection for semantic roles // Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. — 2009. — Vol. 36. — P. 307–340. 127 Johansson R., Nugues P. A FrameNet-based semantic role labeler for Swedish // Proceedings of the COLING/ACL. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006. — P. 436–443. 128 Fung P., Chen B. BiFrameNet: bilingual frame semantics resource construction by cross-lingual induction // Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004. 129 Kaljahi R., Foster J., Roturier J. Semantic role labelling with minimal resources: Experiments with French. — 2014. — P. 87–92. 130 Burchardt A., Erk K., Frank A. A WordNet Detour to FrameNet. — 2005. 131 Johansson R., Nugues P. Using WordNet to extend FrameNet coverage. — 2007. 132 Automatic induction of FrameNet lexical units / Marco Pennacchiotti, Diego De Cao, Roberto Basili et al. // Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. 133 Fürstenau H., Lapata M. Semi-supervised semantic role labeling via structural alignment // Computational Linguistics. — 2012. — Vol. 38, no. 1. — P. 135–171. 134 Lang J., Lapata M. Similarity-driven semantic role induction via graph partitioning // Computational linguistics. — 2014. — Vol. 40, no. 3. — P. 633–669. 135 Lang J., Lapata M. Unsupervised semantic role induction via split-merge clustering // Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. — Vol. 1. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011. — P. 1117–1126. 136 Titov I., Klementiev A. Crosslingual induction of semantic roles // Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012. 137 Baroni M., Zamparelli R. Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: Representing adjective-noun constructions in semantic space // Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010. — P. 1183–1193. 138 Ge R., Mooney R. J. A statistical semantic parser that integrates syntax and semantics // Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. — P. 9– 16. 139 Zettlemoyer L. S., Collins M. Learning to map sentences to logical form: Structured classification with probabilistic categorial grammars // In Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Uncertainty in AI. — 2005. — P. 658–666. 140 Tsuruoka Y., Miyao Y., Tsujii J. Towards efficient probabilistic HPSG parsing: integrating semantic and syntactic preference to guide the parsing // Proceedings of the IJCNLP-04 Workshop on Beyond Shallow Analyses. — 2004. 141 Levine R. D., Meurers W. D. Head-driven phrase structure grammar: Linguistic approach, formal foundations, and computational realization / Ed. by Keith Brown. — Oxford : Elsevier, 2006. — Vol. 5. — P. 237–252. — URL: http://purl.org/dm/papers/ell2-hpsg.html. 142 Тузов В. А. Компьютерная семантика русского языка. — СПбГУ, 2003. — С. 400. 143 Lluìs X., Màrquez L. A joint model for parsing syntactic and semantic dependencies // Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. — P. 188– 192. 144 Lluìs X. Joint Learning of Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies : Ph.D. thesis / Xavier Lluìs ; Master Thesis, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (Artificial Intelligence Program), Barcelona. — 2008. 145 Lluìs X., Bott S., Màrquez L. A second-order joint Eisner model for syntactic and semantic dependency parsing // Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. — P. 79–84. 146 A latent variable model of synchronous parsing for syntactic and semantic dependencies / James Henderson, Paola Merlo, Gabriele Musillo, Ivan Titov // Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. — P. 178–182. 147 A latent variable model of synchronous syntactic-semantic parsing for multiple languages / Andrea Gesmundo, James Henderson, Paola Merlo, Ivan Titov // Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. — P. 37–42. 148 Multi-lingual joint parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies with a latent variable model / James Henderson, Paola Merlo, Ivan Titov, Gabriele Musillo // Computational Linguistics. — 2013. — Vol. 39, no. 4. 149 Titov I., Henderson J. A latent variable model for generative dependency parsing // Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Parsing Technologies. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. — P. 144–155. 150 Mixing and blending syntactic and semantic dependencies / Yvonne Samuelsson, Oscar Täckström, Sumithra Velupillai et al. // Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. — P. 248–252. 151 Dai Q., Chen E., Shi L. An iterative approach for joint dependency parsing and semantic role labeling // Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. — P. 19–24. 152 Chen E., Shi L., Hu D. Probabilistic model for syntactic and semantic dependency parsing // Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. — P. 263– 267. 153 Sun W., Li H., Sui Z. The integration of dependency relation classification and semantic role labeling using bilayer maximum entropy Markov models // Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. — P. 243–247. 154 McCallum A., Freitag D., Pereira F. C. N. Maximum entropy Markov models for information extraction and segmentation // Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning. — Vol. 17. — Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2000. — P. 591–598. 155 Morante R., Van Asch V., Van den Bosch A. Joint memory-based learning of syntactic and semantic dependencies in multiple languages // Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. — P. 25–30. 156 Llus X., Carreras X., Màrquez L. Joint arc-factored parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies // Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. — 2013. — Vol. 1. — P. 219–230. 157 Завьялова О. С. О принципах построения словаря глаголов для задач автоматического анализа текста // Труды ежегодной международной конференции "Диалог 2004". — 2004. 158 Падучева Е. В. Динамические модели в семантике лексики. — М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2004. 159 Апресян Ю. Д. Избранные труды. Том I. Лексическая семантика (синонимические средства языка). — М.: Языки русской культуры, 1995. — P. 472. 160 RU-EVAL-2012: Evaluating dependency parsers for Russian / Anastasia Gareyshina, Maxim Ionov, Olga Lyashevskaya et al. // Proceedings of COLING 2012: Posters. — The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee, 2012. — P. 349–360. 161 Синтаксический анализатор системы ЭТАП и его оценка с помощью глубоко размеченного корпуса русских текстов / И. М. Богуславский, Л. Л. Иомдин, Д. Р. Валеев, В. Г. Сизов // Труды международной конференции "Корпусная лингвистика – 2008". — СПб.: Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, 2008. — С. 56–74. 162 Синтаксически размеченный корпус русского языка: инструкция пользователя [Электронный ресурс]. — 2013. — фев. — URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru/instruction-syntax.html. 163 Buchholz S., Marsi E. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing // Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006. — P. 149–164. 164 Designing and evaluating a Russian tagset / Sharoff Serge, Kopotev Mikhail, Erjavec Tomaz et al. // Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08). — European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2008. 165 MULTEXT-East morphosyntactic specifications, version 4 [Электронный ресурс]. — 2013. — дек. — URL: http://nl.ijs.si/ME/V4/msd/html/msd-ru.html. 166 Сокирко А. В. Морфологические модули на сайте www.aot.ru // Труды международной конференции "Диалог 2004". — 2004. — P. 559–565. 167 Сокирко А. В., Толдова С. Ю. Сравнение эффективности двух методик снятия лексической и морфологической неоднозначности для русского языка (скрытая модель Маркова и синтаксический анализатор именных групп) // Интернет-математика-2005. — 2005. 168 Berg-Kirkpatrick T., Burkett D., Klein D. An empirical investigation of statistical significance in NLP // Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. — Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012. — P. 995–1005. 169 Learning to rank for robust question answering / Arvind Agarwal, Hema Raghavan, Karthik Subbian et al. // Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. — 2012. — P. 833–842. 170 Dang H. T., Kelly D., Lin J. J. Overview of the TREC 2007 question answering track // Proceedings of The Sixteenth Text REtrieval Conference, TREC 2007. — 2007. 171 Voorhees E. M., Tice D. M. The TREC-8 question answering track report // Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2000. — 2000. 172 Marchionini G. Exploratory search: from finding to understanding // Communications of the ACM. — 2006. — Vol. 49, no. 4. — P. 41–46. 173 Васильева Н. Э. Шаблоны употреблений терминов и их использование при автоматической обработке научно-технических текстов // Труды международной конференции "Диалог 2004". — 2004. — P. 96–101. 174 Большакова Е. И., Носков А. А. Программные средства анализа текстов на основе лексико-синтаксических шаблонов языка LSPL // Программные системы и инструменты: Тематический сборник. — 2010. — № 11. — С. 61– 73. 175 Терминологический анализ текста на основе лексико-синтаксических шаблонов / Н. Э. Ефремова, Е. И. Большакова, А. А. Носков, В. Ю. Антонов // Труды международной конференции "Диалог 2010". — Т. 9. — М.: Изд-во РГГУ, 2010. — С. 124–129. 176 Большакова Е. И. Язык лексико-синтаксических шаблонов LSPL: опыт использования и пути развития // Программные системы и инструменты: Тематический сборник. — 2014. — № 15. 177 Russian statistical taggers and parsers [Электронный ресурс]. — 2015. — май. — URL: http://corpus.leeds.ac.uk/mocky/. 178 Золотова Г. А., Караулов Ю. Н. Синтаксический словарь: Репертуар элементарных единиц русского синтаксиса. — Наука, 1988.